[MAT logo][Prev][Up][Next]

Configuration of real-time features

Introduction

All applications have requirements on timing, but for most kinds of computer programs they are not particularly strict. If a word-processor unexpectedly takes several seconds to do some operation, it is not a problem. For PLC programs, however, they are often very important. The mechanisms used to deal with the timing requirements are collectively called "real-time".

MatPLC modules will be able to run in one of two modes: normal, and hard real-time. Different modules can run in different modes at the same time. Hard real-time mode is available on any Oprating System, but will only give the hard real-time guarantees if a hard real-time Operating System is being used. Currently this means the QNX hard real-time operating system, as this is the only hard real-time Operating System under which the MatPLC may be compiled. However, since the MatPLC is completely POSIX compliant, other POSIX compliant hard real-time operating systems may probably be used.

normal
No action taken to guarantee response time. This is suitable for demos and low-priority monitoring, but not much else. This is the default. Status: available now.
hard real-time
The module executes under a fixed real-time priority using fixed priority scheduling. This provides timing guarantees (this does not necessarily mean that it's fast; merely that the timing is accurate when it needs to be), but requires a real-time operating system, and some care in writing the module itself. Status: available now under QNX.

Real-time and synch

There is some interaction between the real-time stuff and synch; fortunately, the rule is simple: never make a synch arrow from a low priority module to a high priority one.

You can synch between equal-priority modules, and you can make synch arrows from high priority modules to lower priority ones; but never the other way around.

Modules

In general, there's no change to a module regardless of whether it's running normal or hard real-time.

However, there are some modules which may not run in hard real-time mode, because of the nature of their work. For instance, if a module needs to write to a file, it has to be normal. For the generic and specific modules, this is noted in the manual where appropriate. For custom modules, the module-writer needs to be careful: if any system calls are used, the module may not be run in hard real-time mode.

Swapping

As you can imagine, being swapped out to disk will give a module a sizeable timing glitch. The first step, then, is to make sure it doesn't happen. The downside is that only programs that run as root can do this.

The setting memlock in the [PLC] section controls this. When it's 1, all modules will be locked into memory. (Due to the way the MatPLC works, it's not really sensible do this on a per-module basis.)

Hard Real-Time

The setting priority controls this. This is a per-module setting, i.e. under the section devoted to each module. When it's greater than PRIORITY_MIN, the module is made hard real-time with the given priority. The allowable range is from PRIORITY_MIN to PRIORITY_MAX. The values PRIORITY_MIN/MAX differ from operating system to operating system. Under QNX, PRIORITY_MIN = 1, and PRIORITY_MAX = 63.

Only modules started by root will be able to go hard real-time.

Low-latency kernels

The timing performance of Normal can be improved by using a low-latency kernel. Such a kernel switches between processes more often than the generic one, thus reducing the latency in any one process. The cost is that all this switching does reduce overall performance slightly, which is why this tuning parameter is set differently for general purpose kernels.

Similarly, different versions of the kernel have different default schedulers, which have different features. For instance, see this article on LinuxDevices.com about the linux 2.6 improvements.

Better than LXRT MatPLC

MatPLC, like any general purpose product or framework, is a compromise between various aspects. If timing accuracy is paramount, one will have to skip the niceties and write a (hopefully small) part of the application as a kernel-space hard-RT task doing direct I/O. Writing and debugging such code is beyond the scope of this manual.

Much tighter results still can be obtained by pushing the speed-sensitive parts to FPGA or other hardware; John Storrs's LME Craftsman project (FIXME - add URL) takes this approach, giving nice, clean, jitter-free oscilloscope traces.

As far as the MatPLC is concerned, these would simply be "smart I/O". For instance, the MatPLC could command direction, speed and number of steps, and the kernel-task or FPGA would generate the stepper motor train.

[Prev][Up][Next]

$Date: 2006/05/02 13:53:54 $